For years, getting a lot of calcium has been portrayed as one of the best things to prevent osteoporosis and related bone fractures. Small study results supported this view. But when researchers started to analyze the data from large, prospective studies that followed people for many years, the benefits were not so clear-cut, reports the March 2008 issue of the Harvard Health Letter.
The ambiguity led to trials to test what effect calcium might have on fracture rates. Two studies showed that calcium did not prevent fractures, even when taken in combination with vitamin D, while another showed that post-menopausal women who took a calcium-vitamin D combination were no less likely to break their hip than those who took a placebo. And other researchers reported the results from a meta-analysis of studies on calcium that found no connection between high calcium intake and lower hip fracture risk.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze