An independent review of the actions of Germany's Bayer AG regarding the surgical clotting agent Trasylol (aprotinin injection) has concluded that the firm did not deliberately withhold negative safety data, derived from a study conducted by US clinical research company i3, from the Food and Drug Administration. The original allegation was that Bayer had not presented the relevant findings at a meeting with the FDA's Advisory Committee, which had been specifically convened to discuss safety issues relating to the product on September 21 last year (Marketletter October 2, 2006).
"Employees made serious error of judgement"
The investigation, which was conducted by lawyer William Taylor of US firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, revealed that only two employees from Bayer's Global Drug Safety Office had access to, and were aware of, preliminary results from the i3 safety examination prior to September 21, 2006, and that they had not disclosed this information due to doubts about the methodology of the study.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze