Australia’s PBAC makes world-first biosimilar drug substitution decision

19 June 2015
biosimilars_samples_large

Australia’s independent Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) has made a world-first recommendation to allow clinicians and pharmacists to give patients the option of substituting expensive biologic medicines at the chemist if there is a cheaper replacement or ‘biosimilar’ available that has been determined by experts to be a safe, equally-effective treatment.

Biosimilar versions of biologic medicines can offer comparable health benefits safely at a lower price, just like generics did for common chemical-based synthetic medicines a decade ago. There are already biosimilar versions of medicines listed on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) that are being safely prescribed to patients as equally-effective treatments to biologics, according to a Department of Health and Ageing statement.

Allows consumers to choose to substitute biosimilar version of biologic medicine

What this PBAC recommendation simply relates to is the ability for consumers to be able to choose to substitute their biologic medicine for a cheaper biosimilar at the chemist if it is approved as a safe and equally effective treatment by the Therapeutic Goods Administration, the PBAC and their doctor.

Doctors and specialists would continue to have a say over whether or not substitution should occur for a patient when writing their script if they do not consider it appropriate in their individual case, just like they currently do with generic medicines. It is important consumers are also aware they would still have the ultimate choice regarding whether they receive the biologic medicine or the biosimilar at the chemist when they fill their script, the ministry said.

This recommendation recognizes the rapid growth in this type of treatment by Australians, with five of the top 10 drugs subsidized on the PBS now biologic drugs that would cost patients between A$400 ($310) and A$1,700 per treatment without taxpayer subsidisation. This has in turn seen spending increase from about 4% of the total cost of the PBS a decade ago to about a quarter (25%) of the PBS today.

Essential to ensure taxpayer investment in this rapidly growing sector

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK









Company Spotlight



More Features in Biosimilars