An Expert View from Justin Kozak, life sciences industry lead, Founder Shield.
The biotech industry, a beacon of innovation and hope, is facing a silent, insidious threat: the alarming rise of 'zombie companies'. These aren't just struggling startups; they're entities perpetually out of cash, making no tangible progress, yet stubbornly clinging to life. From a risk management perspective, these aren't merely stagnant; they're actively harmful, draining vital resources, stifling genuine innovation, and casting a long shadow over investor confidence. This post will delve into the profound damage these undead companies inflict, equip you with the foresight to spot early warning signs, and provide crucial risk management strategies to ensure your venture not only survives but thrives amidst this growing challenge.
Furthermore, their consistent underperformance also scares off potential investors, dampening overall confidence in the sector and making it harder for innovative, healthy startups to secure necessary capital. This creates a significant opportunity cost: the money, lab space, and — crucially — the brilliant scientific and business talent tied up in these stagnant companies could be driving breakthroughs elsewhere.
Beyond the financial toll, these undead firms stifle innovation and contribute to market stagnation. They occupy valuable market space and monopolize talent, making it incredibly difficult for genuinely novel startups with viable solutions to gain traction. Their collective sluggishness casts a negative halo effect over the entire industry, creating a perception of overall unprofitability or lack of progress. Perhaps most disheartening, talented individuals often get stuck in these companies, their skills and ambition wasted on ventures going nowhere, ultimately hindering the very progress biotech aims to achieve
Identifying a 'zombie' before it fully infects the ecosystem is crucial. The signs often emerge across both financial statements and operational behaviors. On the financial front, be wary of companies engaged in constant fundraising with no clear milestones achieved. They're burning through capital, but the promised progress — be it clinical trial advancements or product launches — never materializes.
A high burn rate coupled with stagnant or declining revenue or pipeline progress is another flashing red light. You might also notice difficulty securing follow-on funding from existing, once-eager investors, indicating a loss of confidence. Indefinitely delaying critical clinical trials or product development phases often points to deeper, unresolved issues.
Beyond the numbers, operational and strategic indicators are just as telling. A lack of clear strategic direction or constantly shifting goalposts signals internal disarray. High employee turnover, especially among senior leadership or key scientific personnel, suggests a sinking ship.
Perhaps most concerning is no discernible progress on promised breakthroughs or product launches; the company just exists without delivering. Their excessive focus shifts to merely 'staying alive' rather than achieving meaningful objectives. Finally, a pervasive resistance to difficult decisions or a clear pivot often seals their fate, trapping them in an unsustainable holding pattern.
Next, strategic clarity and iteration are vital. Define clear, measurable goals and timelines for every project and product. Regularly evaluate progress against these goals, holding yourselves accountable. Embrace honest self-assessment and a willingness to pivot or re-evaluate your core strategy when the data demands it. Establish clear 'kill points' or decision gates for projects; sometimes, ending a non-viable path is the smartest move.
Next, strategic clarity and iteration are vital. Define clear, measurable goals and timelines for every project and product. Regularly evaluate progress against these goals, holding yourselves accountable. Embrace honest self-assessment and a willingness to pivot or re-evaluate your core strategy when the data demands it. Establish clear 'kill points' or decision gates for projects; sometimes, ending a non-viable path is the smartest move.
For your investors, transparency is key. Maintain open and honest communication with them, even when progress is slow. Set realistic expectations from the outset. Remember, investor confidence is built on trust and demonstrated progress, not just your continued existence.
Finally, while not a silver bullet, understanding the role of insurance is part of overall financial prudence. Coverages like D&O, E&O and cyber insurance can mitigate specific risks, but they are not a substitute for sound business practices. Proper insurance planning supports a healthy operation, but it won't resurrect a fundamentally failing business model.
By embracing proactive risk management and honest self-assessment, biotech founders can protect their ventures, ensuring that true innovation thrives in an industry finally free from the drag of its undead.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze