The prospect of the US Supreme Court ruling that law suits against drugmakers are restricted by the pre-emptive role of Food and Drug Administration regulations (Marketletters passim), is raised by a report in the New York Times, which argues that the agency fails to protect patient interests.
Chris Seeger, a lawyer representing 125 clients in a case against Johnson & Johnson, told the the NY Times: "our law suits are the ultimate check against the mistake made by the government, or fraud made by the companies against the government, or just an underfunded bureaucracy stretched thin."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze