Agency experts should be required to give presentations at all future US Food and Drug Administration advisory committee meetings discussing specific products, the consumer body Public Citizen said in a petition.
In a study published by the medical journal The Lancet in December 2006, Public Citizen reported that 49 of 275 public meetings of the FDA's human drug advisory committees that reviewed drug product applications between 1997 and 2006 did not include an oral presentation on the product by the agency. Because a drug or product's sponsor cannot be relied upon to present unbiased information, advisory committee members can be left with a one-sided oral presentation on which to base significant public health recommendations, it claims.
Public Citizen's petition calls on the FDA to require that all future advisory committee meetings include an oral scientific presentation by FDA staff on the products reviewed, including a thorough safety and efficacy assessment. Currently, advisory committee members receive briefing materials from both the drug sponsor and the agency before the meeting, but there is no guarantee that they will evaluate the hundreds of pages of information in detail, the petition argues.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze