Legal setbacks and legislative inaction may push US FTC to consider 'Plan C' to address patent settlement agreements

1 December 2010

Recent judicial setbacks for the USA’s Federal Trade Commission) in actions challenging patent settlement agreements (often called  “pay-for-delay” or “reverse payment” deals) and opposition from both Republicans and Democrats to the inclusion of the Preserve Access to Affordable Generics Act (S 369) in the Fiscal Year 2011 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Bill (S 3677) may cause the FTC to consider “Plan C” to address such agreements, according to the agency’s Commissioner J Thomas Rosch.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK









Company Spotlight



More Features in Generics