IGWG assumptions "contradict" WHO statements, report argues

6 April 2008

A commentary by a group of think-tanks, including the UK-based International Policy Network, claims that there are flaws in the assumptions of the Intergovernmental Working Group on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (IGWG), which released its draft strategy and plan of action in July last year (Marketletters passim). The document, which was circulated to the Marketletter in advance of its official launch at the end of March, notes that the IGWG bases its recipe for government interventions on the belief that there is a shortage of R&D for diseases that affect poorer countries and that the combination of patents and branded drug prices are barriers to access for patients in the developing world.

This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free.  A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.

Login to your account

Become a subscriber

 

£820

Or £77 per month

Subscribe Now
  • Unfettered access to industry-leading news, commentary and analysis in pharma and biotech.
  • Updates from clinical trials, conferences, M&A, licensing, financing, regulation, patents & legal, executive appointments, commercial strategy and financial results.
  • Daily roundup of key events in pharma and biotech.
  • Monthly in-depth briefings on Boardroom appointments and M&A news.
  • Choose from a cost-effective annual package or a flexible monthly subscription
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed

Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK









Company Spotlight