An appeal court in the eastern French city of Colmar has rejected an April decision of a lower court and ruled in favor of the Leclerc supermarkets, which had placed advertisements calling for changes in the law to allow the sale of non-reimbursable drugs in its stores. The campaign is fiercely opposed by the pharmacy federations. The action against Leclerc was brought by the USPO and UNPG pharmacy associations, Univers Pharmacie and Directlabo SA. Leclerc was ordered to withdraw its TV adverts by a Colmar tribunal on April 21.
The TV advert argues that the sale of non-reimbursable medicinal products in Leclerc's super- and hypermarkets would help reduce prices. The head of the chain, Michel-Edouard Leclerc, said that he could sell drugs at prices 25% below the average if the government agrees to open the mass distribution market to the non-reimbursable drug sector (Marketletters passim).
The appeal court ruled the campaign did not entail any denigration of pharmacies and that, even though the advertising images were slightly aggressive, they did not exceed the limits allowed "in matters of humorous expression." In addition, the court noted that, in fact, the campaign was predicated on a change in legislation which was quite hypothetical.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze