US drug major Merck & Co does not have to compensate parties suing for reparations of money paid for tests to clear them for damage caused by the arthritis drug Vioxx (rofecoxib; Marketletters passim), a US high court found.
The claimants in question suffered no adverse effects from the drug but wanted Merck to pay for diagnostic evaluations to determine whether there was any long-term damage to their hearts. The New Jersey Supreme Court voted five to one (with one abstaining) that a suit could not be brought against the firm unless actual damage was experienced that could be shown to be as a direct result of the use of the drug.
A previous suit in 2005 had returned the same verdict, however, an appellate court ruled that the dismissal was premature. The 45,000 claimants are not elligible for a $4.9 billion settlement Merck had offered to thos who actually experienced adverse effects.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze