The publication of a report by the UK's House of Commons Health Select Committee into the performance of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), which recommends treatments for the National Health Service in England and Wales, has prompted mixed responses. The report avoids the issue of pharmaceutical pricing, arguing that this is an ongoing topic of negotiation between the drug industry and the UK government. The existing pricing mechanism for publicly-provided drugs, the Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme, is under separate review by the government, following a critical study by the Office of Fair Trading (Marketletters passim).
The Biotechnology Industry Association offered the report a "cautious welcome," the Association of the British Industry Association warned that "patients will not benefit from Select Committee recommendation on [the] NICE," and the Multiple Sclerosis Society approved the shift towards more transparency and faster review times. The NICE described the report as "positive and helpful."
NICE rationing role admitted
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze