An international study of nearly 100 clinical trials that were stopped early due to positive treatment effects has found that many of those effects were exaggerated. The authors of the study - published in the current issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association - recommend that researchers resist pressures to end clinical trials early and continue studies for longer periods before even considering premature termination.
'Our research shows that, in most cases, early stopping of clinical trials resulted in misleading estimates of treatment effects. These misleading estimates are likely to result in misguided decisions about the trade-off between risks and benefits of a therapy,' says Victor Montori, Mayo Clinic endocrinologist and corresponding author of the study. 'On average, treatments with no effect would show a reduction in relative risk of almost 30% in stopped early trials. Treatments with a true relative risk reduction of 20% would show a reduction of over 40%,' he noted.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze