The pharmaceutical industry's efforts to self-regulate its direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertising are "an industry-sponsored ruse," intended to deflect criticism and collectively block new federal regulation, a study released in the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law found. The paper, titled The Politics and Strategy of Industry Self-Regulation: The Pharmaceutical Industry's Principles for Ethical Direct-to-Consumer Advertising as a Deceptive Blocking Strategy, was written by Denis Arnold, associate professor of management and Surtman Distinguished Scholar in business ethics in the Belk College of Business at UNC Charlotte, USA, with Jim Oakley, associate professor of marketing at Montana State University.
Drs Arnold and Oakley studied the marketing campaigns for erectile dysfunction (ED) drugs over a four-year period, 2006 to 2010. These products include sildenafil citrate, manufactured and marketed as Viagra in the USA by Pfizer; tadalafil, manufactured and marketed as Cialis in the by Eli Lilly; and vardenafil, manufactured by Bayer Healthcare and jointly marketed as Levitra in the USA by Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline and Merck.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze