Following indications by UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown that he is considering proposals for a "National Health Service constitution," the independent think-tank the King's Fund, has pointed out that there are pitfalls to avoid when drafting one.
Both the Labour Party and the Conservatives are reportedly supportive of the idea of a constitution for the NHS. However, establishing one risks creating a legal minefield in which the courts could have the final say on which drugs are available to patients, says the think-tank.
Niall Dickson, chief executive of the King's Fund, said: "a constitution could provide real benefits but there are dangers if it is not thought through with care. A detailed list of patients' rights could become caught up in endless legal wrangling. On the other hand, a constitution which simply reiterates core principles or restates existing targets, such as 18-week waiting times, without any enforceable rights for patients would lack credibility."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze