A UK House of Commons Health Committee report has criticized the manner in which the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence(NICE), which advises on what therapies should be available on the National Health Service, excluding Scotland, assesses expensive treatments, saying this is "both inequitabale and inefficient use of resources." The report from Members of Parliament follows a move to allow patients, particularly those suffering with cancer, to pay themselves for drugs not backed by the NICE, the so-called top-up payments (Marketletters passim)
In the conclusions and recommendations of the House Health Committee report, it is stated, among other things, that:
- the Department of Health has accepted the Health Committee's criticism made in 2008 that the NICE had, in some cases, been too slow in appraising new drugs. It welcomed the Department's commitment that the maximum time between a drug's referral to the NICE for evaluation and its availability for prescription will be six months;
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze