At a recent meeting, the Finnish Pharmaceuticals Pricing Board decided to adopt the reimbursement status of two patented antipsychotics for a short period of time only. In one of the cases, the practical implication of the decision is the cancelling of the reimbursement status of a medicine with valid patent protection.
While one of the decisions is motivated by the fact that a more affordable generic copy has been introduced to the market, the other view is based on the PPB waiting for changes in the sector.
The PPB is making use of the weakness of the Finnish patent legislation, or the fact that, in Finland, a copy can enter the market prematurely compared with the European norm, in other words when the innovative medicine still has a valid patent in force, says the country's drugmakers association, the PIF.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze