A recent report by the US competition authority, the Federal Trade Commission, on the short and long-term effects of authorized generics sparked an article in the Business Report this month, titled: Delay in generics robbing South Africa's sick.
The article states that a practice of entering into agreements between brand manufacturers and manufacturers of generic drugs to delay launch of a generic version of a branded drug (often referred to a pay-for-delay deals) are entered into and thus force consumers to pay 80% more for their medication.
However, Alexis Apostolidis, partner, Patent Litigation, and head of the Competition Law Group writing in Biz Community, says that, from his experience in pharmaceutical litigation it is highly unlikely that in South Africa - as in the USA, pay for delay agreements are entered into, as “It's just not the form that these agreements take,” and “It's unfortunate that the article did not address the differences between the legal and regulatory framework in South Africa versus that of the United States.”
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze