A report by a Chicago, USA-based think-tank examines the claim that the introdiction of the Medicare Part D program for retired citizens has reduced demand for imported medicines from Canada "up to 30%."
Diana Ernst, writing in the Heartland Institute's journal, finds a series of conflicting interests and hopes about the new prescription drug benefit. On the one hand, Canadian Internet pharmacists insist that it is "definitely not accurate" to claim a fall of 30% in demand, although the claim that any fall since January 1, could be a "seasonal issue," as suggested by Andy Troszok, president of the Canadian International Pharmacy Association, seems implausible, given that winter is generally a period of high demand for medication.
Canadian drug exporters have a clear interest in any reports that the Medicare Part D scheme is failing to deliver drugs, or that the savings are less than for importation via the Internet. A particular bone of contention is the American Association for Retired People's claims that enrollees on their Medicare prescription plan can save more than by importation (Marketletter January 16).
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze