In a presentation at the 10th International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer in St Gallen, Switzerland, US drug major Pfizer challenged the perception that aromatase inhibitors have a class effect. It argued that an emerging body of evidence suggests the differing mechanisms of action of non-steroidal and steroidal drugs in this group have markedly different therapeutic effects.
EFECT study highlights differences in class
The opinion is based on data from a trial of the firm's steroidal aromatase inhibitor Aromasin (exemestane), which was designed to compare the effect of the drug with that of fulvestrant, a selective estrogen receptor down regulator (SERD), in women with metastatic breast cancer who have failed on an AI in the adjuvant or first-line setting.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze