A bill introduced in the US Senate by Democrat Senator David Pryor would allow a generic firm to market its version of a brand-name drug during the patent extension period provided by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, the US enabling legislation of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, provided it had completed the penultimate steps of the Abbreviated New Drug Approval process before June 8, 1995.
Sen Pryor's bill, the Consumer Access to Prescription Drugs Act (S 1191), would amend the 1984 Waxman/Hatch generic drug approval amendments, which state that ANDAS filed for products already under patent protection may not be approved for 30 months. His bill also defines the term "substantial investment" which would allow generics to be marketed during the transition period, stating that this refers to "the development of a product formulation and the manufacture of an experimental batch of a drug that becomes the subject of an application, or the initiation of stability of bioequivalence studies by an applicant."
Also deemed to have made a "substantial investment" in the generic product is any "person who supplied any active ingredient used by such applicant in such drug or by such manufacturer in such drug."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze