There are cost and efficacy advantages in switching asthmatic patients from chlorofluorocarbon-propelled pressurized metered dose inhalers to non-CFC, dry powder inhalers, specifically Astra's Turbuhaler, according to the results of an open-label study published in the journal Chest (July 1).
The TACTIC (Turbuhaler as an Alternative to CFC Inhalers - a Trial in Clinical practice) study showed that doctors can switch their patients from CFC-containing pMDIs to the Turbuhaler with no loss, and even some improvement, in asthma control. 1,004 patients considered adequately controlled with a corticosteroid and/or short-acting beta agonist using CFC-based inhalers, were randomized either to continue on their current regime or switch to terbutaline and/or budesonide delivered via Turbuhaler.
The results showed that the average number of weeks when the mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) was less than 90% of baseline was 4.5 weeks in the Turbuhaler as opposed to 6.0 weeks in the pMDI group. There was also a statistically significant difference, in favor of the Turbuhaler, in the number of two-day periods when PEF was less than 80% of baseline (1.7 days versus 2.2 days).
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze