President Bush's proposal in his State of the Union message to make the 20% tax credit on incremental R&D spending permanent is a positive for the drug industry, Hemant Shah of HKS & Co has told the Marketletter. But there was a large negative on health care in Mr Bush's speech, even though no specific recommendations were made.
If there is any major health care reform, even though it will not go so far as national health insurance, it will have a major negative impact on the industry, he said, with more institutional involvement leading to higher generic and therapeutic substitution. It is institutions, not so much individuals, who use generics, he said. Also, the enactment of some sort of health care reform this year is almost certain.
David Saks of Wedbush Morgan said it was more a matter of what Mr Bush did not say than what he did say. Drug stocks were hurt moving into January by continued fall-out from the Pennsylvania elections in which the health care issue played a large part, but the State of the Union message did not contain oppressive anti-drug sentiment. Any form of price control or regulation in the health care industry would mean a domino effect hitting both generic and brand-name firms, he said.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze