A US House of Representatives' subcommittee has cleared proposals for the oversight by the Food and Drug Administration of direct-to-consumer advertising by drugmakers. The more rigorous restrictions were removed, amid concerns that any outright ban or delay would be open to a constitutional challenge under the First Amendment (which protects freedom of speech).
Instead, the Democrat-controlled subcommittee voted 23-nine to give the FDA the authority to fine drug firms up to $250,000 for running "false or misleading" advertisement, according to Reuters. The purpose of a ban, Rep Henry Waxman (Democrat, California) explained, would be "dampening consumer interest in a drug whose risks may be serious but are not yet fully known."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
| Headless Content Management with Blaze