Two simultaneous developments in India are bringing the issue of patent protection to the forefront. The court case involving Swiss drug major Novartis' challenge of Section 3(d) of the Indian Patent Amendment Act 2005 has resumed at the end of March. Meanwhile, the government-sponsored Mashelkar commission review of the same legislation appears to have descended into chaos with the resignation of its chairman, RA Mashelkar, following an allegation of plagiarism which has been exploited by his critics (Marketletter March 13).
Novartis chairman Daniel Vasella told shareholders in March that the firm would accept the verdict of the Chennai High Court which is expected in April. The firm's decision to appeal the January ruling by the Patents Office to reject an application for Glivec/Gleevec (imatinib) has been strongly criticized by local generic drugmakers and foreign anti-patent groups.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze