A US Federal judge has ordered a retrial in US drug major Merck & Co's most recent legal defeat relating to the withdrawn painkiller Vioxx (rofecoxib). Judge Eldon Fallon upheld the original verdict but described the $50.0 million damages award as "grossly excessive." He added that the new trial will decide the level of damages that the plaintiff, a former FBI agent who suffered a heart attack in 2002 after taking the drug for two and a half years, is entitled to receive. Media reports show that opinion is divided as to whether the retrial decision is a positive outcome for Merck, with some groups claiming that it is a vindication of the firm's case-by-case defence strategy. Others, including lawyer Robert Gordon, who has successfully represented plaintiffs in Vioxx cases, said that the liability verdict was the most critical aspect.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2024 | Headless Content Management with Blaze