The US Federal Trade Commission's proposed consent order approving Eli Lilly's acquisition of PCS (Marketletters passim) fails to protect consumers from monopolistic practices by drug companies, according to both leaders of the chain drug store industry and consumer groups.
Even with the stipulations proposed, anti-competitive forces will work against the public welfare through higher prescription prices for consumers, says National Association of Chain Drug Stores president Ron Zeigler, who adds that drug company acquisitions of Pharmacy Benefit Managers are a means to transfer wealth from community retail pharmacies, their customers and other drugmakers to the coffers of vertically integrated companies, to the detriment of the public welfare. The failure of the consent order to deal with pricing to retail pharmacies and a five-year period of duration for the consent (rather than 10) were among concerns raised.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze