US drug major Merck & Co has urged a New Jersey judge to reduce the $47.5 million award made to an Idaho man who successfully sued the firm after suffering a heart attack that was attributed to his use of the now withdrawn painkiller Vioxx (rofecoxib), according to an Associated Press report.
Frederick Humeston of Boise, Idaho, was awarded $20.0 million in compensation and $21.5 million in punitive damages earlier this year (Marketletter March 19), as a result of his 2001 heart attack.
Merck's lawyer, Matt Shore, asked presiding judge Carol Higbee to reduce the award, which he said was more than 27 times above Idaho's $730,000 limit for compensatory damages. He also argued that the level of punitive damages had been "influenced by improper argument by Humeston's lawyers."
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze