The US Food and Drug Administration is seeking public comment on its proposed policy on industry-sponsored continuing medical education, after a draft petition filed by the Washington Legal Foundation claimed that the proposal violates the right to freedom of speech under the First Amendment.
The agency says its draft policy statement on industry-supported scientific and educational activities, published on November 27, 1992, accepts that discussion of unapproved uses of drugs can be an important component of scientific and educational activities. It does not prohibit such discussion, but encourages disclosure of the fact that a product is not approved in the USA for the use under discussion.
The FDA disagrees with the WLF's characterisization of agency policy, and asks how, given its narrow scope, the draft might preclude health care professionals from receiving important scientific information regarding unapproved uses for approved products. Nevertheless, it adds, a full airing of the issues will be useful, and has set a deadline for comment of February 16, 1995.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze