US pharmaceutical major Wyeth has announced that the jury in the cases of Suzan Talbot versus Wyeth, Sharon Thacker vs Wyeth, Ernestine Vigil vs Wyeth and Jorie Williams vs Wyeth in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas rendered a decision in the first phase of the trial, alleging damages caused by its now withdrawn fenfluramine-based diet drugs. During the first part of this bifurcated (two-phase) trial, the jury awarded $109,100 to Ms Talbot, $88,700 to Ms Thacker, $90,400 to Ms Vigil and $104,000 to Ms Williams. The second phase of this case is scheduled to begin on March 27.
"We are disappointed in the jury's verdict in this case and believe it was not supported by the evidence presented. In each instance, the only physicians claiming that the plaintiffs have an injury were hired by their lawyers," says Mike Scott "In the second phase of this case, we will show that Wyeth acted responsibly at all times and should not be held liable for any award to these plaintiffs," he added.
Of the five plaintiffs who were originally included in this trial group, one voluntarily dismissed his case before it commenced, noted Wyeth.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze