The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has initiated an evaluation of its guidance on the use of bisphosphonates, after the High Court in London ruled that the agency's policy was indeed unlawful in not releasing the economic model it used to make its recommendations (Marketletter March 2).
The NICE, which reviews treatments for National Health Service patients across the UK and Wales, had stipulated that physicians should only prescribe a cheap generic version of Merck & Co's off-patent Fosamax (alendronate) in the early stages of the condition, despite it being unsuitable for over one in five patients (Marketletter November 3, 2008).
The National Osteoporosis Society, a non-profit patients' group and the UK unit of the French drugmaker Servier Laboratories, challenged the guidance because many patients who are unable to tolerate bisphosphonates (currently recommended as the initial approach) have to wait for their bone mineral density to deteriorate before they are given an alternative treatment.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze