Wellcome is actively looking for "a better offer for shareholders and a better outcome for the business" than the one Glaxo has made (Marketletter January 30), was Wellcome's response after some days of silence to the move by Glaxo to acquire the company, with a bid of L8.9 billion ($13.9 billion).
Wellcome says that it is seeking a higher value, and that Glaxo's offer fails to recognize its strengths, which it lists as being: pre-eminence in rapidly growing antiviral markets; an outstanding record of innovation and promising pipelines in antivirals, central nervous system, and anticancer drugs; excellent record of revenue and earnings growth; and strong market position, especially in the USA and Europe.
John Robb, chairman and chief executive of Wellcome, suggests that the company's financial results for 1994 (see page 4), which were unpublished at the time of his comment, will show it in a better light than that on which Glaxo is basing its offer.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze