The Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association has welcomed the verdict in the country's Supreme Court, in a dispute over the application of supplementary patents for drugs. The court explicitly rejected the practice known as "evergreening," where a firm proposes to add "bells and whistles to a pioneering product even after the original patent for that pioneering product has expired."
The dispute between Anglo-Swedish drug major AstraZeneca and Apotex, Canada's largest drugmaker, concerned Losec 20 (omeprazole), an antiulcer agent, the patent for which was orginally due to expire in 1999.
Jim Keon, the CGPA's president, in giving his reaction to the ruling, claimed that "the federal government's recent changes to drug patent rules amount to little more than a multi-million dollar gift to brand-name companies at the expense of the taxpayer, provincial governments and consumers." The new regulations were issued last month by the Conservative government, which won a close federal election in January, despite fears raised by the then governing Liberals that the new administration would promote the interests of branded drug companies.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze