UK drug major GlaxoSmithKline says that new findings from a retrospective cohort study indicate that initial therapy with its antidiabetic Avandia (rosigltazone maleate) was associated with significantly fewer physician visits, and reduced health costs, than sulfonylurea.
GSK reported that the study, which compared medical, pharmacy and disability insurance claim data from more than 3,000 patients, indicates the use of Avandia was associated with a $300.0 per patient per month reduction in direct health care costs compared with sulfonylurea ($1,065 versus $1,315). Total medical costs were also lower for Avandia ($1,221 vs $1,512).
In addition, patients taking Avandia required fewer medical services than those treated with sulfonylurea in terms of inpatient visits per person per year (0.47 vs 0.77) and outpatient visits (17.0 vs 17.9). Multivariate analysis, taking age and gender differences into account, revealed that Avandia resulted in a cost reduction of $108.0 per patient per month.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze