The Divisional Court of Ontario, Canada, has rejected a claim by generic drug manufacturer Apotex stating that the province's Health Minister had exceeded her authority or acted unlawfully in May 1993 when she imposed a freeze on the prices of generic prescription products listed in the province's drug formulary as substitutes for branded drugs.
Apotex had brought the case after the province had rejected its application to increase the prices of 16 of its products in 1994.
Introducing the price freeze in the previous year, Ruth Grier, the Health Minister at that time, had told the generics manufacturers that if they increased their prices, their products' designations on the formulary as substitutes for branded medicines could be removed.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze