The percentage of primary care physicians and endocrinologists who consider the cardiovascular safety of UK drug major GlaxoSmithKline\'s Avandia (rosiglitazone) to be a major concern increased more than nine-fold following the publication of a meta-analysis (Marketletters passim), according to a new study conducted in the USA by health care advisory firm Decision Resources.
Published in May 2007 by Steve Nissen in the New England Journal of Medicine, the meta-analysis called into question the cardiovascular safety of Avandia and featured analysis of data from several different trials showing the drug increases the risk of myocardial infarction 43%. Prescriptions for Avandia dropped significantly in the weeks following. Indeed, in its first-quarter 2008 results, GSK noted that sales of the drug had slumped 56% year-on-year to just L191.0 million ($378.5 million, and plunged 66% in the USA (Marketletter April 28).
According to the new Physician and Payer Forum report entitled Avandia One Year Later-A Physician and Payer Perspective, the full impact of the meta-analysis on Avandia prescribing has not yet been felt. 58% of US PCPs and 52% of endocrinologists say they will reduce their prescribing of Avandia over the next year.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze