The US Senate Appropriations Committee's Labor, Health and HumanServices and Education subcommittee has heard proposals for a possible 10-year extension of marketing exclusivity for certain drugs, in exchange for drugmakers giving money to the National Institutes of Health, but says such a proposal is unlikely to be enacted this year.
The plan, being considered for inclusion in the Labor and Health and Human Resources spending bill, is opposed by health and consumer groups and the generic industry. Panel chairman Arlen Specter said lawmakers may want to study the idea of raising more NIH funds from drugmakers, but the idea is not ripe for inclusion in this year's spending bill.
Reuters notes that the plan would give any drug approved by the Food and Drug Administration in the last five years another five years' market exclusivity in exchange for the company paying 3% of the money it makes from the drug to the NIH, which sponsors much of the basic research drug companies build on. No-one has claimed sponsorship of the proposal.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze