A consortium of US consumer groups headed by the Prescription AccessLitigation project has filed a lawsuit against Bayer in order to try to dissolve an agreement between the company and three generic firms that it claims is "blocking access to adequate supplies and cheaper generic versions of Cipro" (ciprofloxacin).
The suit also alleges that Bayer has paid the generics firms, including Barr Laboratories, $200 million not to produce the antibiotic and abandon their argument that Bayer's patents on the drug were invalid. Cipro has emerged as a drug of choice for treating anthrax, and the suit maintains that broadening US production of the drug is "critical to public health in this country."
Bayer said it stands by the validity of its US patents on Cipro, which give it protection until 2003, while Barr pointed out that the agreement provides for generic competition in July of that year, even though the patent extends through to December.
This article is accessible to registered users, to continue reading please register for free. A free trial will give you access to exclusive features, interviews, round-ups and commentary from the sharpest minds in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology space for a week. If you are already a registered user please login. If your trial has come to an end, you can subscribe here.
Login to your accountTry before you buy
7 day trial access
Become a subscriber
Or £77 per month
The Pharma Letter is an extremely useful and valuable Life Sciences service that brings together a daily update on performance people and products. It’s part of the key information for keeping me informed
Chairman, Sanofi Aventis UK
Copyright © The Pharma Letter 2025 | Headless Content Management with Blaze